AG Pam Bondi Asked: 'Were You Informed Of Judge Boesberg's March 15th Verbal Order To Turn Planes Around?'

 

President Trump With AG Pam Bondi

AG Pam Bondi Pressed on Judge Boesberg’s Order to Halt Deportation Flights

At a press briefing, Attorney General Pam Bondi was asked about Judge James Boesberg’s March 15th verbal order directing the administration to turn around deportation flights carrying individuals from El Salvador.

Judge’s Order & Legal Challenges

When asked if she was aware of Judge Boesberg’s directive and whether the administration defied the order, Bondi responded:

"I don't think anyone defied an order by a judge. That’s pending in court right now. Our attorneys have argued in court, and I anticipate this will go to the Supreme Court, where it will be ruled in our favor."

Bondi emphasized that the legal team is still awaiting a ruling, suggesting that the situation remains fluid in the courts.

Deportation Flights Were Already in Motion

Bondi clarified that the deportation flights in question were already airborne and had left U.S. airspace when the order was issued. She defended the administration’s actions, stating:

"Testimony came out in court that those planes not only had taken off but were outside of American airspace."

This suggests that compliance with the judge’s order may not have been possible, as the deportees were already in transit.

Who Was Being Deported?

According to Bondi, the flights were carrying criminal illegal aliens from El Salvador, many of whom, she alleged, had committed violent crimes in the U.S. She pointed to a chart showing the criminal history of certain deportees, stating:

"They were some of the worst of the worst to qualify under the Alien Enemies Act. We should be more concerned about the victims of these crimes in our states than about these defendants."

Legal & Political Implications

• The Alien Enemies Act allows the U.S. government to deport individuals deemed a national security threat.

• Judge Boesberg’s ruling is likely to face appeals and could be reviewed by the Supreme Court.

• The case highlights tensions between federal judges and the administration over immigration enforcement.

What’s Next?

Bondi’s comments indicate that the administration is confident in its legal position and expects the Supreme Court to ultimately rule in its favor. Meanwhile, deportation flights remain a highly controversial issue, with opponents arguing that legal protections for migrants must be upheld, while supporters insist that removing dangerous criminals is a matter of public safety.

FAQs – AG Pam Bondi on Judge Boesberg’s Deportation Order

1. What was Judge Boesberg’s order on March 15th?

Judge James Boesberg issued a verbal order instructing the administration to halt deportation flights and turn them around.

2. Did the administration defy the judge’s order?

AG Pam Bondi denied that the administration defied any court order, stating that the flights had already taken off and left U.S. airspace when the order was issued.

3. Who was on the deportation flights?

Bondi stated that the flights were carrying criminal illegal aliens from El Salvador, many of whom were accused of violent crimes.

4. Why is this case controversial?

The case highlights tensions between the judicial system and the administration regarding immigration enforcement. Some argue that due process must be followed, while others insist that public safety requires swift deportations.

5. What law allows these deportations?

Bondi cited the Alien Enemies Act, which allows the U.S. government to deport individuals deemed a national security threat.

6. Will the Supreme Court get involved?

Bondi believes the case will go to the Supreme Court, where she expects a ruling in favor of the administration’s deportation policy.

7. What happens next?

The administration is awaiting further rulings, while immigration advocates and legal experts closely monitor the case.